Non-Closure of Peritoneum Leads to Reduced used of Analgesics and Less Post-Operative Pain as Compared to the Closure of Peritoneum in Appendectomy
نویسندگان
چکیده
Objective: To compare the post-operative use of analgesics in closure and non-closure of peritoneum in appendectomy. Material and Methods: One hundred patients undergoing an appendectomy divided in two groups, each group having fifty patients were analyzed in this study. The patients were randomly allocated in two groups; group A (appendectomy with peritoneum closed) and group B (appendectomy with peritoneum not closed) using a random number. After the procedure the patients were assessed for the use of analgesics required. Personal, preoperative and postoperative clinical information of all the patients were recorded and assessed using SPSS version 12 Results: The number of complaints and doses of analgesia in both groups were compared. Statistically the significant difference was noted only between number of complaints in group A and Group B (P<0.05). Conclusion: The appendectomy with minimal tissue handling enables an early recovery, less need for analgesics.
منابع مشابه
study of short-term complications and advantages of peritoneal closure or non-closure at cesaeran
In the randomized clinical trial 200 pregnant women reffred to Niknafs maternity center from November 1997 to May 1998 were divided into two groups and underwent cesarean section.in the first group (control) the parietal and visceral peritoneum were approximated with delayed absorbable material whereas in the second group (case) the parietal and visceral peritoneum were left open.the mean age o...
متن کاملمقایسه نتایج زودرس ترمیم و عدم ترمیم پریتوئن احشایی در سزارین
Background & Aim: Because cesarean section is one of the most prevalent surgeries in women , the reduction of complications and duration of operation and finding simpler techniques with the fewest complications are of great importance. The present study was conducted to compare the early results, i.e. duration of operation, pain, fever and wound infection, of the two methods of repairing an...
متن کاملA Randomized Study Comparing Non-Closure and Closure of Visceral and Parietal Peritoneum During Cesarean Section
Objectives: To assess the short term morbidity of non-closure of the visceral and parietal peritoneal at caesarean section as compared to suture peritonization. Methods: A prospective randomized controlled trial of 200 women undergoing cesarean section was done; randomized into non-closure and closure groups. Perioperative, intraoperative and postoperative details were recorded in the proforma....
متن کاملThe effect of peritoneal repair or non-repair on complications after open appendectomy
Abstract Introduction: Appendicitis is the most common condition of emergency surgery. Complications after appendectomy include skin complications, infection, postoperative pain, hernia and obstruction. There is a difference of opinion among surgeons on peritoneal repair after abdominal surgery. Therefore, we aimed here to evaluate the effect of peritoneal repair versus non-repair in appendec...
متن کاملClosure or Non-Closure of Peritoneum in Cesarean Section: Outcomes of Short-Term Complications
BACKGROUND Cesarean section (CS) is one of the most frequently performed surgical procedures worldwide. The complications following a CS include fever, wound infection, post-operative pain and bleeding which are not usually found in a normal vaginal delivery. Traditionally, suturing of peritoneal layers for CS patients has been done, but in some studies it has been shown that this procedure cou...
متن کامل